- SquirrelFish: The engine used by Safari 4.0. Note: The latest WebKit nightly for Windows crashes on Dromaeo, so it's passed for now.
- V8 : The engine used by Google Chrome.
- SpiderMonkey: The engine that powers Firefox (up to, and including, Firefox 3.0).
- TraceMonkey: The engine that will power Firefox 3.1 and newer (currently in nightlies, but disabled by default).
- Futhark: The engine used in Opera 9.5 and newer.
- IE JScript: The engine that powers Internet Explorer.
There have, already, been a number of performance tests run on the above browsers - and a few of those runs have also included the new Chrome browser. It's important to look at these numbers and try and gain some perspective on what the tests are testing and how those numbers relate to actual web page performance.
We have three test suites that we're going to look at:
We see a fairly steady curve, heading down to Chrome (ignoring the Internet Explorer outliers). Chrome is definitely the fastest in these results - although the results from the new TraceMonkey engine aren't included.
Brendan Eich pulled together a comparison, last night, of the latest TraceMonkey code against V8.
We already see TraceMonkey (under development for about 2 months) performing better than V8 (under development for about 2 years).
The biggest thing holding TraceMonkey back, at this point, is its recursion tracing. As of this moment no tracing is done across recursive calls (which puts TraceMonkey as being about 10x slower than V8 at recursion). Once recursion tracing lands for Firefox 3.1 I'll be sure to revisit the above results.
Google Chrome Benchmark
Note TraceMonkey performing poorly: It's unable to benefit from any of the tracing due to the lack of recursion tracing (as explained above).
Dromaeo with DOM
(No results for IE were provided as the browser crashes when running the tests, unfortunately - also I had trouble getting the WebKit nightlies, with Squirrelfish, to run on Windows, see bug 20626.)
We see a very different picture here. WebKit-based engines are absolutely ahead - but Chrome is lagging behind the latest release of Safari. And while there is a small speed improvement while using TraceMonkey, over regular Firefox, the full potential won't be unlocked until tracing can be performed over DOM structures (which it is currently incapable of - may not be ready until Firefox 3.2 or so).